Free invisible hit counter
About Us Events & News Products Case Studies Download Distributors Literature Services

Products ARTeMIS Extractor Pro Technical Details Dealing with Harmonics in EFDD


 
ARTeMIS Extractor Pro:
Overview

What's new

Features

Technical Details
 

Downloads:
Datasheet (PDF)

Trial version


Order:

Request Quote


 
IOMAC Conference
Get intensive training and the latest information on operational modal analysis.

More Info

 
Download ARTeMIS
Download free evaluation versions of the ARTeMIS modal software packages.

Go to download page

 
Newsletter Sign-up
Sign up for our newsletter about the ARTeMIS Vibration Testing and Analysis Products
Enter your Email address

 




 

 

 
Dealing with Harmonics in EFDD

If a structure being tested has rotating parts the measurements made will not only include the response to the natural input but also the response coming from the sinusodial forced excitation. The influence of these harmonic components can be eliminated from the modal estimation.

The consequences of having harmonic components present in the responses depend on both the nature of the harmonic components (number, frequency and level) and the modal parameter extraction method used. For the EFDD technique it is important that harmonic components inside the desired SDOF are identified and their influence eliminated before proceeding with the modal parameter extraction process.

Below an example demonstrates what happens without detection and elimination of harmonics, and what happens when detection and elimination is active.

Without Detection and Elimination of Harmonics

In the figure below a EFDD Peak Picking has been done on a mode that is located close to a harmonic. The harmonics typically has much higher energy than the nearby modes and the resulting SDOF model is completely dominated by the harmonic.

SDOF model strongly affected by the neighboring harmonic.

This means that the estimated mode shape looks like the operating deflection shape at the frequency of the harmonic. The estimated natural frequency corresponds to the frequency of the harmonic, and the damping is underestimated during to the persistant sinusodial excitation. The damping and frequency estimates are as such extremely inaccurate, which can be seen in the validation diagram of the EFDD method, shown below.

Free decay estimation also strongly affected by the sinusodial excitation. The decay is unrealistic small.

With Detection and Elimination of Harmonics

When detection is enabled all the harmonic components lights up with a green background color and the EFDD estimator is informed about their location in the SVD diagram. Since the estimator knows the position it can reconstruct the SDOF model at those positions by interpolation. The result is a SDOF model that is unaffected by any nearby harmonics as shown below:

SDOF model now unaffected by the neighboring harmonic indicated by a green vertical line.

Since the SDOF model peaks at the correct frequency and with correct shape the modal parameters are now estimated correctly, which can be validated as seen below:

Free decay estimation show a much more realistic decay and the extreme values used for the damping estimation looks much better now.

Back to Technical Details

 

Structural Vibration Solutions A/S • Niels Jernes Vej 10 • DK-9220 Aalborg East • Denmark • Tel: +45 9635 4422 • Fax: +45 9635 4575 • svibs@svibs.com